Il 02/08/23 08:24, CK Hu (胡俊光) ha scritto:
Hi, Angelo:

On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 11:49 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
        
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
you have verified the sender or the content.
  Instead of stack allocating the cmdq_client and cmdq_handle
structures
switch them to pointers, allowing us to migrate this driver to use
the
common functions provided by mtk-cmdq-helper.
In order to do this, it was also necessary to add a `priv` pointer to
struct cmdq_client, as that's used to pass (in this case) a mtk_crtc
handle to the ddp_cmdq_cb() mailbox RX callback function.

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
angelogioacchino.delre...@collabora.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 107 +++++++---------------
--
  include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h   |   1 +
  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
index 0df62b076f49..b63289ab6787 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ struct mtk_drm_crtc {
        bool                            pending_async_planes;
#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
-       struct cmdq_client              cmdq_client;
-       struct cmdq_pkt                 cmdq_handle;
+       struct cmdq_client              *cmdq_client;
+       struct cmdq_pkt                 *cmdq_handle;
        u32                             cmdq_event;
        u32                             cmdq_vblank_cnt;
        wait_queue_head_t               cb_blocking_queue;
@@ -108,47 +108,6 @@ static void mtk_drm_finish_page_flip(struct
mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
        }
  }
-#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
-static int mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(struct cmdq_client *client,
struct cmdq_pkt *pkt,
-                                  size_t size)
-{
-       struct device *dev;
-       dma_addr_t dma_addr;
-
-       pkt->va_base = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-       if (!pkt->va_base) {
-               kfree(pkt);
-               return -ENOMEM;
-       }
-       pkt->buf_size = size;
-       pkt->cl = (void *)client;

I have a plan to remove cl in struct cmdq_pkt. But this modification
would make this plan more difficult. So I would pending this patch
until cl is removed from struct cmdq_pkt.


I think that this ifdef cleanup is more urgent than the removal of `cl` from
struct cmdq_pkt, as those ifdefs shouldn't have reached upstream in the first
place, don't you agree?

Regards,
Angelo

Reply via email to