On 7/24/23 09:27, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 02:06:16 +0800
kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> wrote:

tree:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc for-linux-next
head:   c7a472297169156252a50d76965eb36b081186e2
commit: 4f66feeab173bd73e71028b8c2e1dcea07e32dd5 [2/2] drm: debugfs: provide 
infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space
config: i386-randconfig-r092-20230720 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230721/202307210230.t2onm5g0-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce: 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230721/202307210230.t2onm5g0-...@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
| Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307210230.t2onm5g0-...@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c:212:33: sparse: sparse: non size-preserving 
pointer to integer cast

vim +212 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c

    178 
    179 /**
    180  * drm_debugfs_gpuva_info - dump the given DRM GPU VA space
    181  * @m: pointer to the &seq_file to write
    182  * @mgr: the &drm_gpuva_manager representing the GPU VA space
    183  *
    184  * Dumps the GPU VA mappings of a given DRM GPU VA manager.
    185  *
    186  * For each DRM GPU VA space drivers should call this function from 
their
    187  * &drm_info_list's show callback.
    188  *
    189  * Returns: 0 on success, -ENODEV if the &mgr is not initialized
    190  */
    191 int drm_debugfs_gpuva_info(struct seq_file *m,
    192                            struct drm_gpuva_manager *mgr)
    193 {
    194         struct drm_gpuva *va, *kva = &mgr->kernel_alloc_node;
    195 
    196         if (!mgr->name)
    197                 return -ENODEV;
    198 
    199         seq_printf(m, "DRM GPU VA space (%s) [0x%016llx;0x%016llx]\n",
    200                    mgr->name, mgr->mm_start, mgr->mm_start + 
mgr->mm_range);
    201         seq_printf(m, "Kernel reserved node [0x%016llx;0x%016llx]\n",
    202                    kva->va.addr, kva->va.addr + kva->va.range);
    203         seq_puts(m, "\n");
    204         seq_puts(m, " VAs | start              | range              | end    
            | object             | object offset\n");
    205         seq_puts(m, 
"-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
    206         drm_gpuva_for_each_va(va, mgr) {
    207                 if (unlikely(va == kva))
    208                         continue;
    209 
    210                 seq_printf(m, "     | 0x%016llx | 0x%016llx | 0x%016llx | 
0x%016llx | 0x%016llx\n",
    211                            va->va.addr, va->va.range, va->va.addr + 
va->va.range,
  > 212                                 (u64)va->gem.obj, va->gem.offset);

Oops, I didn't notice it when reviewing. You're leaking a kernel address
to user space here. You should probably use %p to print the GEM object
address, and add `no_hash_pointers` to your cmdline when you want to
debug things.

%p doesn't really work well in terms of formatting, plus for debugfs I thought this might be fine. I could maybe use ptr_to_hashval(), but then 'no_hash_pointers' wouldn't do anything for it.


    213         }
    214 
    215         return 0;
    216 }
    217 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_debugfs_gpuva_info);
    218 



Reply via email to