[AMD Official Use Only - General] > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 10:16 PM > To: Quan, Evan <evan.q...@amd.com> > Cc: raf...@kernel.org; l...@kernel.org; Deucher, Alexander > <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian > <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <xinhui....@amd.com>; > airl...@gmail.com; dan...@ffwll.ch; johan...@sipsolutions.net; > da...@davemloft.net; eduma...@google.com; k...@kernel.org; > pab...@redhat.com; Limonciello, Mario <mario.limoncie...@amd.com>; > mdaen...@redhat.com; maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com; > tzimmerm...@suse.de; hdego...@redhat.com; jingyuwang_...@163.com; > Lazar, Lijo <lijo.la...@amd.com>; jim.cro...@gmail.com; > bellosili...@gmail.com; andrealm...@igalia.com; t...@redhat.com; > j...@jsg.id.au; a...@arndb.de; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > a...@vger.kernel.org; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri- > de...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; > net...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF > mitigations > > > The wbrf_supported_producer and wbrf_supported_consumer APIs seem > > unnecessary for the generic implementation. > > I'm happy with these, once the description is corrected. As i said in another > comment, 'can' should be replaced with 'should'. The device itself knows if it > can, only the core knows if it should, based on the policy of if actions need > to > be taken, and there are both providers and consumers registered with the > core. Sure, will update that in V7.
Evan > > Andrew
