On 7/4/2023 3:58 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 03:18:26PM +0530, Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya wrote:
On 7/4/2023 2:08 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 11:57:51AM +0530, Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
index 5c57f7b4494e..a51b1594dcfa 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_control.c
@@ -748,7 +748,8 @@ static int encode_message(struct qaic_device *qdev, struct
manage_msg *user_msg,
int ret;
int i;
- if (!user_msg->count) {
+ if (!user_msg->count ||
+ user_msg->len < sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
@@ -765,12 +766,13 @@ static int encode_message(struct qaic_device *qdev,
struct manage_msg *user_msg,
}
for (i = 0; i < user_msg->count; ++i) {
- if (user_len >= user_msg->len) {
+ if (user_len >= user_msg->len - sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
If I understand correctly this check is added to verify if we are left with
trans_hdr size of data. In that case '>' comparison operator should be used.
That was there in the original code and I thought about changing it but
I don't like changing things which aren't necessary and == is also
invalid so I decided to leave it.
I see, I understand your concern about not changing unnecessary things but
'>=' is incorrect for reason mentioned above. We need to change that to '>'
Oh, yes. You're right. I will need to resend.
For the next revision, please add #include <overflow.h>
I believe the size_add() use that you propose is the first need of that
file, and while it may be implicitly included from something we do
include, I prefer to have explicit includes.
Otherwise I don't see anything else to add.
