On 2023-06-24 03:49:25, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 24.06.2023 02:41, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > SM6125 features only a single PHY (despite a secondary PHY PLL source
> > being available to the disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk_src clock), and downstream
> > sources for this "trinket" SoC do not define the typical "vcca"
> > regulator to be available nor used.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suij...@somainline.org>
> > ---
> The introduced ops are identical to 2290, modulo regulator..

Sure, I can create a "drop unused regulators from 14nm qcm2290 config"
and a second "reuse qcm2290 14nm dsi phy for sm6125" patch, instead of
this one.

> But the regulator is absent on both (VDD_MX powers it instead), so

In the DT patch you requested me to use CX instead of MX... Which one is
it?

Also note that I moved it from DSI PHY to DSI0 because that's where the
rpmpd opps reside.

- Marijn

> feel free to clean that up and reuse it ;)

> 
> Konrad
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c      |  2 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h      |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> > index 9d5795c58a98..8688ed502dcf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> > @@ -559,6 +559,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_phy_dt_match[] = {
> >       .data = &dsi_phy_14nm_2290_cfgs },
> >     { .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660",
> >       .data = &dsi_phy_14nm_660_cfgs },
> > +   { .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125",
> > +     .data = &dsi_phy_14nm_6125_cfgs },
> >     { .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-8953",
> >       .data = &dsi_phy_14nm_8953_cfgs },
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> > index 8b640d174785..ebf915f5e6c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_20nm_cfgs;
> >  extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_cfgs;
> >  extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_660_cfgs;
> >  extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_2290_cfgs;
> > +extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_6125_cfgs;
> >  extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_8953_cfgs;
> >  extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_10nm_cfgs;
> >  extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_10nm_8998_cfgs;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c
> > index 3ce45b023e63..5d43c9ec69ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c
> > @@ -1068,6 +1068,21 @@ const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_660_cfgs = 
> > {
> >     .num_dsi_phy = 2,
> >  };
> >  
> > +const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_6125_cfgs = {
> > +   .has_phy_lane = true,
> > +   .ops = {
> > +           .enable = dsi_14nm_phy_enable,
> > +           .disable = dsi_14nm_phy_disable,
> > +           .pll_init = dsi_pll_14nm_init,
> > +           .save_pll_state = dsi_14nm_pll_save_state,
> > +           .restore_pll_state = dsi_14nm_pll_restore_state,
> > +   },
> > +   .min_pll_rate = VCO_MIN_RATE,
> > +   .max_pll_rate = VCO_MAX_RATE,
> > +   .io_start = { 0x5e94400 },
> > +   .num_dsi_phy = 1,
> > +};
> > +
> >  const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_14nm_8953_cfgs = {
> >     .has_phy_lane = true,
> >     .regulator_data = dsi_phy_14nm_17mA_regulators,
> > 

Reply via email to