[AMD Official Use Only - General]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 4:24 PM
> To: Limonciello, Mario <mario.limoncie...@amd.com>; Quan, Evan
> <evan.q...@amd.com>
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; amd-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-
> wirel...@vger.kernel.org; raf...@kernel.org; l...@kernel.org; Deucher,
> Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian
> <christian.koe...@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <xinhui....@amd.com>;
> airl...@gmail.com; dan...@ffwll.ch; kv...@kernel.org; n...@nbd.name;
> lore...@kernel.org; ryder....@mediatek.com; shayne.c...@mediatek.com;
> sean.w...@mediatek.com; matthias....@gmail.com;
> angelogioacchino.delre...@collabora.com; Lazar, Lijo <lijo.la...@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] wifi: mac80211: Add support for ACPI WBRF
>
> On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 21:17 -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> >
> > > --- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
> > > @@ -920,6 +920,14 @@ const struct cfg80211_chan_def *
> > >   cfg80211_chandef_compatible(const struct cfg80211_chan_def
> *chandef1,
> > >                               const struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef2);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz - get the channel width in Mhz
> > > + * @chan_width: the channel width from &enum nl80211_chan_width
> > > + * Return: channel width in Mhz if the chan_width from &enum
> > > +nl80211_chan_width
> > > + * is valid. -1 otherwise.
> > > + */
> > > +int nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz(enum nl80211_chan_width
> chan_width);
> > > +
> >
> > It's up to mac80211 maintainers, but I would think that the changes to
> > change nl80211_chan_width_to_mhz from static to exported should be
> > separate from the patch to introduced WBRF support in the series.
>
> Yeah, that'd be nice :)
OK, I will move that into a new patch.
>
>
> > > +#define KHZ_TO_HZ(freq)          ((freq) * 1000ULL)
>
> Together with MHZ_TO_KHZ() for example :)
Sure.

Evan
>
> johannes

Reply via email to