On 05.05.2023 13:25, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
>
> We'll need to turn the code in clk_mux_determine_rate_flags() to deal
> with CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT into a helper clock drivers will be able
> to use if they don't want to allow reparenting.
>
> Cc: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Andreas Färber" <[email protected]>
> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
> Cc: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
> Cc: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chunyan Zhang <[email protected]>
> Cc: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
> Cc: David Lechner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
> Cc: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
> Cc: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Max Filippov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mikko Perttunen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Miles Chen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
> Cc: Orson Zhai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paul Cercueil <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peter De Schrijver <[email protected]>
> Cc: Prashant Gaikwad <[email protected]>
> Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
> Cc: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: NXP Linux Team <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
> ---
This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit 1b4e99fda73f ("clk:
Move no reparent case into a separate function"). Unfortunately it
causes serious regression of some of my test boards. Namely Exynos3250
based boards are so slow after it, that my test scripts fail with a
timeout waiting for them to finish booting. I will try to debug this
later in the evening to check what has happened that some clocks got
very low rate.
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 75
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index e495dd7a1eae..f57f821a5e5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -594,6 +594,46 @@ clk_core_forward_rate_req(struct clk_core *core,
> req->max_rate = old_req->max_rate;
> }
> +static int
> +clk_core_determine_rate_no_reparent(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + struct clk_core *core = hw->core;
> + struct clk_core *parent = core->parent;
> + unsigned long best;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> + struct clk_rate_request parent_req;
> +
> + if (!parent) {
> + req->rate = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + clk_core_forward_rate_req(core, req, parent, &parent_req,
> + req->rate);
> +
> + trace_clk_rate_request_start(&parent_req);
> +
> + ret = clk_core_round_rate_nolock(parent, &parent_req);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + trace_clk_rate_request_done(&parent_req);
> +
> + best = parent_req.rate;
> + } else if (parent) {
> + best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent);
> + } else {
> + best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core);
> + }
> +
> + req->rate = best;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
> struct clk_rate_request *req,
> unsigned long flags)
> @@ -603,35 +643,8 @@ int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
> unsigned long best = 0;
> /* if NO_REPARENT flag set, pass through to current parent */
> - if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT) {
> - parent = core->parent;
> - if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> - struct clk_rate_request parent_req;
> -
> - if (!parent) {
> - req->rate = 0;
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - clk_core_forward_rate_req(core, req, parent, &parent_req, req->rate);
> -
> - trace_clk_rate_request_start(&parent_req);
> -
> - ret = clk_core_round_rate_nolock(parent, &parent_req);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - trace_clk_rate_request_done(&parent_req);
> -
> - best = parent_req.rate;
> - } else if (parent) {
> - best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(parent);
> - } else {
> - best = clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core);
> - }
> -
> - goto out;
> - }
> + if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT)
> + return clk_core_determine_rate_no_reparent(hw, req);
> /* find the parent that can provide the fastest rate <= rate */
> num_parents = core->num_parents;
> @@ -670,9 +683,7 @@ int clk_mux_determine_rate_flags(struct clk_hw *hw,
> if (!best_parent)
> return -EINVAL;
> -out:
> - if (best_parent)
> - req->best_parent_hw = best_parent->hw;
> + req->best_parent_hw = best_parent->hw;
> req->best_parent_rate = best;
> req->rate = best;
>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
