On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 02:26:14AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 07/06/2023 17:42, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:23:46PM +0200, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > > > @@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_tearcheck_config(
> > > >          * frequency divided by the no. of rows (lines) in the LCDpanel.
> > > >          */
> > > >         vsync_hz = dpu_kms_get_clk_rate(dpu_kms, "vsync");
> > > > -       if (vsync_hz <= 0) {
> > > > -               DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "invalid - vsync_hz %u\n",
> > > > +       if (!vsync_hz) {
> > > > +               DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "invalid - vsync_hz %lu\n",
> > > >                                  vsync_hz);
> > > 
> > > Nit: no need to print the value here, you know it's zero.  Could be
> > > clarified to just "no vsync clock".
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah.  That's obviously not useful.  Sorry, I will resend.
> 
> I'll fix while applying. Seems easier.

Thanks!

regards,
dan carpenter

Reply via email to