On Tue, 06 Jun 2023, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Siddh,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:15:15PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
>> This reverts commit 1040e424353f5f4d39f6f3aa8723eb3bd6ea6446.
>> 
>> It used an incorrect way to use drm_* functions. Only drm_device ptrs
>> should be passed, but the mentioned commit passed mipi_dsi_host ptr.
>> It worked by accident due to macro magic.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <c...@siddh.me>
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
>
> Any chance we could prevent this from happening by turning the macros
> into inline functions ?

Patch 2 adds static inline struct device *__drm_dev_ptr(const struct
drm_device *drm) which should tackle this.

BR,
Jani.

>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
>> index 3fd6c733ff4e..a37af4edf394 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>>  
>>  #include <drm/display/drm_dsc.h>
>>  #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
>> -#include <drm/drm_print.h>
>>  
>>  #include <video/mipi_display.h>
>>  
>> @@ -156,18 +155,19 @@ static int mipi_dsi_device_add(struct mipi_dsi_device 
>> *dsi)
>>  static struct mipi_dsi_device *
>>  of_mipi_dsi_device_add(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, struct device_node *node)
>>  {
>> +    struct device *dev = host->dev;
>>      struct mipi_dsi_device_info info = { };
>>      int ret;
>>      u32 reg;
>>  
>>      if (of_alias_from_compatible(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
>> -            drm_err(host, "modalias failure on %pOF\n", node);
>> +            dev_err(dev, "modalias failure on %pOF\n", node);
>>              return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>      }
>>  
>>      ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &reg);
>>      if (ret) {
>> -            drm_err(host, "device node %pOF has no valid reg property: 
>> %d\n",
>> +            dev_err(dev, "device node %pOF has no valid reg property: %d\n",
>>                      node, ret);
>>              return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>      }
>> @@ -202,21 +202,22 @@ mipi_dsi_device_register_full(struct mipi_dsi_host 
>> *host,
>>                            const struct mipi_dsi_device_info *info)
>>  {
>>      struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
>> +    struct device *dev = host->dev;
>>      int ret;
>>  
>>      if (!info) {
>> -            drm_err(host, "invalid mipi_dsi_device_info pointer\n");
>> +            dev_err(dev, "invalid mipi_dsi_device_info pointer\n");
>>              return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>      }
>>  
>>      if (info->channel > 3) {
>> -            drm_err(host, "invalid virtual channel: %u\n", info->channel);
>> +            dev_err(dev, "invalid virtual channel: %u\n", info->channel);
>>              return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>      }
>>  
>>      dsi = mipi_dsi_device_alloc(host);
>>      if (IS_ERR(dsi)) {
>> -            drm_err(host, "failed to allocate DSI device %ld\n",
>> +            dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate DSI device %ld\n",
>>                      PTR_ERR(dsi));
>>              return dsi;
>>      }
>> @@ -227,7 +228,7 @@ mipi_dsi_device_register_full(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>  
>>      ret = mipi_dsi_device_add(dsi);
>>      if (ret) {
>> -            drm_err(host, "failed to add DSI device %d\n", ret);
>> +            dev_err(dev, "failed to add DSI device %d\n", ret);
>>              kfree(dsi);
>>              return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>      }
>> 

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to