Hi, Thomas

I love your patch, yet something to improve:


On 2023/5/10 19:05, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Fix coding style. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingf...@loongson.cn>
Tested-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingf...@loongson.cn>
---
  drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_accel.c | 6 +++---
  drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_base.h  | 4 ++--
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_accel.c 
b/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_accel.c
index 9cb0685feddd..ce51227798a1 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_accel.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_accel.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
static inline void matrox_cfb4_pal(u_int32_t* pal) {
        unsigned int i;
-       
+
        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
                pal[i] = i * 0x11111111U;
        }
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static inline void matrox_cfb4_pal(u_int32_t* pal) {
static inline void matrox_cfb8_pal(u_int32_t* pal) {
        unsigned int i;
-       
+
        for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
                pal[i] = i * 0x01010101U;
        }
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static void matroxfb_1bpp_imageblit(struct matrox_fb_info 
*minfo, u_int32_t fgx,
                        /* Tell... well, why bother... */
                        while (height--) {
                                size_t i;
-                               
+
                                for (i = 0; i < step; i += 4) {
                                        /* Hope that there are at least three 
readable bytes beyond the end of bitmap */
                                        
fb_writel(get_unaligned((u_int32_t*)(chardata + i)),mmio.vaddr);
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_base.h 
b/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_base.h
index 958be6805f87..c93c69bbcd57 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_base.h
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/matrox/matroxfb_base.h
@@ -301,9 +301,9 @@ struct matrox_altout {
        int             (*verifymode)(void* altout_dev, u_int32_t mode);
        int             (*getqueryctrl)(void* altout_dev,
                                        struct v4l2_queryctrl* ctrl);

Noticed that there are plenty of coding style problems in matroxfb_base.h,

why you only fix a few of them?   Take this two line as an example, shouldn't

they be fixed also as following?


        int             (*verifymode)(void *altout_dev, u_int32_t mode);
        int             (*getqueryctrl)(void *altout_dev,
                                        struct v4l2_queryctrl *ctrl);


-       int             (*getctrl)(void* altout_dev,
+       int             (*getctrl)(void *altout_dev,
                                   struct v4l2_control* ctrl);
-       int             (*setctrl)(void* altout_dev,
+       int             (*setctrl)(void *altout_dev,
                                   struct v4l2_control* ctrl);
  };

Reply via email to