Hi Uwe,

Thank you for the patch.

On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:25:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
> and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
> quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
> quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
> void.
> 
> Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> callback to the void returning variant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c
> index e21078b2f8b5..d4c1a601bbb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/thc63lvd1024.c
> @@ -230,13 +230,11 @@ static int thc63_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int thc63_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static void thc63_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>       struct thc63_dev *thc63 = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
>       drm_bridge_remove(&thc63->bridge);
> -
> -     return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id thc63_match[] = {
> @@ -247,7 +245,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, thc63_match);
>  
>  static struct platform_driver thc63_driver = {
>       .probe  = thc63_probe,
> -     .remove = thc63_remove,
> +     .remove_new = thc63_remove,
>       .driver = {
>               .name           = "thc63lvd1024",
>               .of_match_table = thc63_match,
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Reply via email to