Hi Uwe,
Thank you for the patch.
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 06:25:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
> and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
> quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
> quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
> void.
>
> Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> callback to the void returning variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> index 6dc2a4e191d7..4a5f5c4f5dcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/nwl-dsi.c
> @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static int nwl_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int nwl_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static void nwl_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct nwl_dsi *dsi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> @@ -1207,12 +1207,11 @@ static int nwl_dsi_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->dsi_host);
> drm_bridge_remove(&dsi->bridge);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver nwl_dsi_driver = {
> .probe = nwl_dsi_probe,
> - .remove = nwl_dsi_remove,
> + .remove_new = nwl_dsi_remove,
> .driver = {
> .of_match_table = nwl_dsi_dt_ids,
> .name = DRV_NAME,
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
