On 21/08/13 15:22, Rob Clark wrote: > And just to be clear, part of my negative experience about this is the > omapdss/omapdrm split. I just see cfd outside of drm as encouraging > others to make the same mistake.
Feel free to disagree, but I think the omapdss/omapdrm split is a bit different matter. The main problem there was splitting the control of a single device (OMAP DSS, and more specifically, DISPC) into two. I don't see CDF causing anything similar. A single DRM driver should manage the DISPC in OMAP's case, and it should (probably) also control the external encoders and panel, even if those are independent CDF drivers. Tomi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
