Hi

Am 06.04.23 um 10:41 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> writes:

From: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>

This one nukes all framebuffers, which is a bit much. In reality
gma500 is igpu and never shipped with anything discrete, so there should
not be any difference.

v2: Unfortunately the framebuffer sits outside of the pci bars for
gma500, and so only using the pci helpers won't be enough. Otoh if we
only use non-pci helper, then we don't get the vga handling, and
subsequent refactoring to untangle these special cases won't work.

It's not pretty, but the simplest fix (since gma500 really is the only
quirky pci driver like this we have) is to just have both calls.

v4:
- fix Daniel's S-o-b address


I believe they want to have their Intel S-o-B as well. I know that dim
complains but that's what usually happens with danvet's patches AFAIK.

I'll do as you suggest and add both.


Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
---

Patch looks good to me. Although I wonder if should just be dropped in
favour of yours patch since are now part of the same series?

That might require a rework of some other patches in this series. So let's just merge both of them.

Best regards
Thomas


Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>


--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to