On 17.02.2023 22:13, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 17/02/2023 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> First, it would be nice to know what was the intention of Bryan's commit?
> 
> Sorry I've been grazing this thread but, not responding.
> 
> - qcom,dsi-ctrl-6g-qcm2290
> 
> is non-compliant with qcom,socid-dsi-ctrl which is our desired naming 
> convention, so that's what the deprecation is about i.e. moving this compat 
> to "qcom,qcm2290-dsi-ctrl"
> 
> Actually I have the question why we are deciding to go with "sm6115" instead 
> of "qcm2290" ?
> 
> The stamp on the package you receive from Thundercomm says "qcm2290" not 
> "sm6115"
Correct, but QCM2290 is not supported upstream yet.

SM6115 (a different SoC) however is, but it used the qcm2290 compatible
as it was a convenient hack to get the DSI host ID recognized based on
the (identical-to-qcm2290) base register without additional driver changes.
We're now trying to untangle that mess..

Konrad
> 
> ?
> 
> ---
> bod
> 
> 

Reply via email to