Hi, Janusz, > Am 2023-02-10 um 11:56 AM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik > <janusz.krzyszto...@linux.intel.com>: > > Hi Isabella, > > On Monday, 19 September 2022 22:55:44 CET Isabella Basso wrote: >> Hi, Janusz, >> >>> Am 09/09/2022 um 12:18 PM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik >>> <janusz.krzyszto...@linux.intel.com>: >>> >>> ... >>> >>> Anyway, related to my comment about naming that function a parser, I think >>> the >>> best approach would be for that parser to return a generic set of results >>> from >>> kunit execution, then we could feed that data into an IGT specific handler >>> that would convert them to IGT results (SUCCESS, FAIL, or SKIP) as if >>> returned >>> by a set of IGT dynamic subtests. >> >> That sounds like a good idea to me, I might take some extra time before v3 to >> do that, though. > > Were you able to make any progress? Do you need any help?
I’ve already handled most common cases but I still have to address Chehab’s comments — specifically in what concerns crashes. I’ve been doing most of the development by myself as GSoC has ended so I’m taking my time on this. My most up-to-date work is available at [1], so if you have any suggestions as to what might be done I’d love to hear them before sending out v3 to the mailing list. [1] - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/isinyaaa/igt-gpu-tools/-/merge_requests/1 Cheers, -- Isabella Basso > Thanks, > Janusz > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "KUnit Development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to kunit-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/7621786.lvqk35OSZv%40jkrzyszt-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com.
