On 1/20/23 19:54, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:36 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
On 1/20/23 15:41, Jagan Teki wrote:
Hi Fabio,
Hello all,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 5:36 PM Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:59 PM Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
There are two patch series prior to this need to apply.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20221212145745.15387-1-ja...@amarulasolutions.com/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20221212182923.29155-1-ja...@amarulasolutions.com/
Would it make sense to re-submit these two patches as part of your series?
The previous version's comment was to separate them from the DSIM series.
Hmmmmm, seems like those first two patches got stuck. I fixed up the
malformed Fixes: line (it was split across two lines and had angular
brackets around it) and picked the first series via drm-misc-next .
Thanks.
We have another series for Exynos, prior to DSIM
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20221212182923.29155-1-ja...@amarulasolutions.com/
Can you send a subsequent patch to convert the DSIM_* macros to BIT()
macro , since checkpatch --strict complains about it ?
Okay.
For the second series, you likely want a RB from Maxime Ripard and Dave
Stevenson first about the probe order handling.
Do you mean for 01/18 and 02/18 patches?
I mean
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20221212182923.29155-1-ja...@amarulasolutions.com/
