Hi

Am 11.01.23 um 16:41 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
This one nukes all framebuffers, which is a bit much. In reality
gma500 is igpu and never shipped with anything discrete, so there should
not be any difference.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
index cd9c73f5a64a..9b0daf90dc50 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int psb_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct 
pci_device_id *ent)
         * TODO: Refactor psb_driver_load() to map vdc_reg earlier. Then we
         *       might be able to read the framebuffer range from the device.
         */
-       ret = drm_aperture_remove_framebuffers(true, &driver);
+       ret = drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers(pdev, &driver);

This does not work. The comment just above the changed line explains why. The device uses shared memory similar to other integrated Intel chips. The console is somewhere in a 16 MiB range, which has been stolen by the BIOS from main memory. There's only a 1 MiB memory range on the device to program the device. Unless you want to refactor as described, this call has to cover the whole memory for now.

Best regards
Thomas

        if (ret)
                return ret;

--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to