On 06/01/2023 17:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 07/12/2022 02:22, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
SM8350 and SM8450 platforms use the same driver and same bindings as the
existing 7nm DSI PHYs. Add corresponding compatibility strings.
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlow...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
index c851770bbdf2..bffd161fedfd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ allOf:
properties:
compatible:
enum:
+ - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350
+ - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450
If this patch was not merged (so far nothing in next), can we make it
proper SoC compatible?
Ack. Bjorn has merged the dtsi bits, but I'll send a fixup.
qcom,sm8450-dsi-phy-5nm
The SC7280 already uses such pattern.
- qcom,dsi-phy-7nm
- qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150
- qcom,sc7280-dsi-phy-7nm
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
