checkpatch highlighted that use of udelay should be replaced by
usleep_range.
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c 
b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c
index 398bdbf53c9a..75cf3bb18414 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_ra8875.c
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void write_reg8_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, 
...)
        }
        len--;
 
-       udelay(100);
+       usleep_range(100, 101);
 
        if (len) {
                buf = (u8 *)par->buf;
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static void write_reg8_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, 
...)
 
        /* restore user spi-speed */
        par->fbtftops.write = fbtft_write_spi;
-       udelay(100);
+       usleep_range(100, 101);
 }
 
 static int write_vmem16_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, size_t offset, size_t len)
-- 
2.38.1

Reply via email to