>-----Original Message-----
>From: dri-devel <dri-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
>Andy Shevchenko
>Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 11:22 AM
>To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkosc...@gmail.com>; Andy Shevchenko
><andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
><gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; Mathias Nyman
><mathias.ny...@linux.intel.com>; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-
>de...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>u...@vger.kernel.org
>Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com>; Kevin Cernekee
><cerne...@gmail.com>; Nyman, Mathias <mathias.ny...@intel.com>; Vivi,
>Rodrigo <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>; Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-
>foundation.org>
>Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] i915: Move list_count() to list.h for broader use
>
>Some of the existing users, and definitely will be new ones, want to
>count existing nodes in the list. Provide a generic API for that by
>moving code from i915 to list.h.
>
>Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
>---
>v2: dropped the duplicate code in i915 (LKP)
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 13 +------------
> include/linux/list.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>index 6ae8b07cfaa1..b5d474be564d 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>@@ -2085,17 +2085,6 @@ static void print_request_ring(struct drm_printer
>*m, struct i915_request *rq)
> }
> }
>
>-static unsigned long list_count(struct list_head *list)
>-{
>- struct list_head *pos;
>- unsigned long count = 0;
>-
>- list_for_each(pos, list)
>- count++;
>-
>- return count;
>-}
>-
> static unsigned long read_ul(void *p, size_t x)
> {
> return *(unsigned long *)(p + x);
>@@ -2270,7 +2259,7 @@ void intel_engine_dump(struct intel_engine_cs
>*engine,
> spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
> engine_dump_active_requests(engine, m);
>
>- drm_printf(m, "\tOn hold?: %lu\n",
>+ drm_printf(m, "\tOn hold?: %zu\n",
> list_count(&engine->sched_engine->hold));
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
>index 61762054b4be..098eccf8c1b6 100644
>--- a/include/linux/list.h
>+++ b/include/linux/list.h
>@@ -655,6 +655,19 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init(struct list_head
>*list,
> !list_is_head(pos, (head)); \
> pos = n, n = pos->prev)
>
>+/**
>+ * list_count - count nodes in the list
>+ * @head: the head for your list.
>+ */
>+#define list_count(head) \
>+({ \
>+ struct list_head *__tmp; \
>+ size_t __i = 0; \
>+ list_for_each(__tmp, head) \
>+ __i++; \
>+ __i; \
>+})
So all of the non-list_for_each code appears to be an inline.
This which, resembles the non-list_for_each pattern is a macro?
Just curious as to why the macro rather than inline?
Mike
+
> /**
> * list_entry_is_head - test if the entry points to the head of the list
> * @pos: the type * to cursor
>--
>2.35.1
