[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Hey,
The patch does the right thing from coding principal perspective, but it is
really redundant check in RAS context.
The function is a hardware interrupt handler which is only triggered for
specific RAS event. When software receives the interrupt, the pointer of RAS
context must be valid one. Otherwise, even the interrupt won't be enabled at
all...
Regards,
Hawking
-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Denis Arefev
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 15:41
To: Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>
Cc: avid Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Daniel Vetter
<dan...@ffwll.ch>; Koenig, Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nbio_v7_4: Add pointer check
Return value of a function 'amdgpu_ras_find_obj' is dereferenced at
nbio_v7_4.c:325 without checking for null
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <are...@swemel.ru>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c
index eadc9526d33f..0f2ac99de864 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/nbio_v7_4.c
@@ -304,6 +304,9 @@ static void
nbio_v7_4_handle_ras_controller_intr_no_bifring(struct amdgpu_device
struct ras_err_data err_data = {0, 0, 0, NULL};
struct amdgpu_ras *ras = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
+ if (!obj)
+ return;
bif_doorbell_intr_cntl = RREG32_SOC15(NBIO, 0, mmBIF_DOORBELL_INT_CNTL);
if (REG_GET_FIELD(bif_doorbell_intr_cntl,
BIF_DOORBELL_INT_CNTL, RAS_CNTLR_INTERRUPT_STATUS)) {
--
2.25.1
