On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:48:28 +0000 Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> If it stays all DRM drivers in one patch then I guess it needs to go via > drm-misc, which for i915 would be okay I think in this case since patch > is extremely unlikely to clash with anything. Or split it up per driver > and then we can handle it in drm-intel-next once core functionality is in. > > We do however have some more calls to del_timer_sync, where freeing is > perhaps not immediately next to the site in code, but things definitely > get freed like on module unload. Would we need to convert all of them to > avoid some, presumably new, warnings? I'm happy to split this patch up. I just got a bit lazy and started just grouping via entire subsystems. You should see the networking patch ;-) -- Steve
