Waitboost (when SLPC is enabled) results in a H2G message. This can result
in thousands of messages during a stress test and fill up an already full
CTB. There is no need to request for RP0 if GuC is already requesting the
same.

v2: Add the tracing back, and check requested freq
in the worker thread (Tvrtko)

Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaum...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index fc23c562d9b2..18b75cf08d1b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -1016,6 +1016,9 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
                if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
                        slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
 
+                       GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "boost fence:%llx:%llx\n",
+                                rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
+
                        /* Return if old value is non zero */
                        if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
                                schedule_work(&slpc->boost_work);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index b7cdeec44bd3..7ab96221be7e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -227,14 +227,19 @@ static int slpc_force_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc 
*slpc, u32 freq)
 static void slpc_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
        struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = container_of(work, typeof(*slpc), 
boost_work);
+       struct intel_rps *rps = &slpc_to_gt(slpc)->rps;
        int err;
 
        /*
         * Raise min freq to boost. It's possible that
         * this is greater than current max. But it will
         * certainly be limited by RP0. An error setting
-        * the min param is not fatal.
+        * the min param is not fatal. No need to boost
+        * if we are already requesting it.
         */
+       if (intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps) == slpc->boost_freq)
+               return;
+
        mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
        if (atomic_read(&slpc->num_waiters)) {
                err = slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, slpc->boost_freq);
-- 
2.35.1

Reply via email to