From: ye xingchen <ye.xingc...@zte.com.cn>

Return the value ttm_pool_alloc() directly instead of storing it in
another redundant variable.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zea...@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingc...@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
index 4e3938e62c08..f17e0da7475d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c
@@ -470,15 +470,11 @@ static void vmw_ttm_destroy(struct ttm_device *bdev, 
struct ttm_tt *ttm)
 static int vmw_ttm_populate(struct ttm_device *bdev,
                            struct ttm_tt *ttm, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
 {
-       int ret;
-
        /* TODO: maybe completely drop this ? */
        if (ttm_tt_is_populated(ttm))
                return 0;
 
-       ret = ttm_pool_alloc(&bdev->pool, ttm, ctx);
-
-       return ret;
+       return ttm_pool_alloc(&bdev->pool, ttm, ctx);
 }
 
 static void vmw_ttm_unpopulate(struct ttm_device *bdev,
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to