[PATCH] dma-buf: use strscpy() is more robust and safer

[cgel . zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.ming...@zte.com.cn>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.

That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.

Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.ming...@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index dd0f83ee505b..51cdd4060539 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static char *dmabuffs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char 
*buffer, int buflen)
        dmabuf = dentry->d_fsdata;
        spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
        if (dmabuf->name)
-               ret = strlcpy(name, dmabuf->name, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
+               ret = strscpy(name, dmabuf->name, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
        spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 
        return dynamic_dname(buffer, buflen, "/%s:%s",
-- 
2.25.1