On Sunday 04 September 2022 23:30:53 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I would like to limit (or maybe even remove) use of
> [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node in drivers so that gpiolib can be cleaned
> a bit, so let's switch to the generic device property API. It may even
> help with handling secondary fwnodes when gpiolib is taught to handle
> gpios described by swnodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torok...@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> index 8e323e93be91..929f9363e94b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-tegra.c
> @@ -2202,10 +2202,11 @@ static int tegra_pcie_parse_dt(struct tegra_pcie
> *pcie)
> * and in this case fall back to using AFI per port register
> * to toggle PERST# SFIO line.
> */
> - rp->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(dev, port,
> - "reset-gpios", 0,
> - GPIOD_OUT_LOW,
> - label);
> + rp->reset_gpio = devm_fwnode_gpiod_get(dev,
> + of_fwnode_handle(port),
> + "reset",
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW,
> + label);
Why in pci-aardvark.c for PERST# reset-gpio you have used
devm_gpiod_get_optional() and here in pci-tegra.c you have used
devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()? I think that PERST# logic is same in both
drivers.
> if (IS_ERR(rp->reset_gpio)) {
> if (PTR_ERR(rp->reset_gpio) == -ENOENT) {
> rp->reset_gpio = NULL;
>
> --
> b4 0.10.0-dev-fc921
