On Sat, 27 Aug 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> For EDID 1.4 the first detailed timing is always preferred,
> for older EDIDs there was a feature flag to indicate the same.
> While correct, the code setting that up is rather confusing.
> Restate it in a slightly more straightforward manner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index c1c85b9e1208..0fe06e5fd6e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -3952,13 +3952,14 @@ static int add_detailed_modes(struct drm_connector 
> *connector,
>       struct detailed_mode_closure closure = {
>               .connector = connector,
>               .drm_edid = drm_edid,
> -             .preferred = true,
>               .quirks = quirks,
>       };
>  
> -     if (closure.preferred && !version_greater(drm_edid, 1, 3))
> +     if (version_greater(drm_edid, 1, 3))
> +             closure.preferred = true; /* first detailed timing is always 
> preferred */
> +     else
>               closure.preferred =
> -                 (drm_edid->edid->features & 
> DRM_EDID_FEATURE_PREFERRED_TIMING);
> +                     drm_edid->edid->features & 
> DRM_EDID_FEATURE_PREFERRED_TIMING;
>  
>       drm_for_each_detailed_block(drm_edid, do_detailed_mode, &closure);

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to