On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:02 AM Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2022 at 14:18, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: > > This patch series actually contains two new ioctls. There is the export > one > > mentioned above as well as an RFC for an import ioctl which provides the > other > > half. The intention is to land the export ioctl since it seems like > there's > > no real disagreement on that one. The import ioctl, however, has a lot > of > > debate around it so it's intended to be RFC-only for now. > > Errr, I think we're good with this one now right? > Yeah, I dropped the RFC from the patch, just not the description in the cover letter, apparently. > From the uAPI point of view, having looked through the Mesa MR, both are: > Acked-by: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> > For reference: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4037 Yes, I agree it's gotten sufficient review at this point that I think we can call the uAPI reviewed. I'm good with landing now. Sorry that took so long but the original version I had only used half of the new API and I wanted to make sure both halves got good testing. --Jason > Cheers, > Daniel >