On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:02 AM Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 7 May 2022 at 14:18, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> > This patch series actually contains two new ioctls.  There is the export
> one
> > mentioned above as well as an RFC for an import ioctl which provides the
> other
> > half.  The intention is to land the export ioctl since it seems like
> there's
> > no real disagreement on that one.  The import ioctl, however, has a lot
> of
> > debate around it so it's intended to be RFC-only for now.
>
> Errr, I think we're good with this one now right?
>

Yeah, I dropped the RFC from the patch, just not the description in the
cover letter, apparently.


> From the uAPI point of view, having looked through the Mesa MR, both are:
> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com>
>

For reference:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4037

Yes, I agree it's gotten sufficient review at this point that I think we
can call the uAPI reviewed.  I'm good with landing now.  Sorry that took so
long but the original version I had only used half of the new API and I
wanted to make sure both halves got good testing.

--Jason



> Cheers,
> Daniel
>

Reply via email to