Hello Uwe,

Thanks for your patch.

On 4/25/22 21:23, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> This function returns zero unconditionally, so there isn't any benefit
> of returning a value. Make it return void to be able to see at a glance
> that the return value of ssd130x_i2c_remove() is always zero.
> 
> This patch is a preparation for making i2c remove callbacks return void.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>
> ---

Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javi...@redhat.com>

and I'll push to drm-misc (drm-misc-next) now.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat

Reply via email to