Am 13.04.22 um 10:44 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:21:33AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
It looks like we still need to call dma_fence_put() on the man->move,
otherwise we just end up leaking it, leading to fireworks later.
Closes:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Fintel%2F-%2Fissues%2F5689&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C989e8d698f6d4f0b37c508da1d29dfb4%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637854363041323745%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=8lxdsjPRiu%2Ft8O4kEHQEKtrMFd7gJbbFz25mYMRk3Ig%3D&reserved=0
Fixes: 8bb31587820a ("drm/ttm: remove bo->moving")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.a...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 015a94f766de..b15b77e10383 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -744,6 +744,8 @@ static int ttm_bo_add_move_fence(struct ttm_buffer_object
*bo,
dma_fence_put(fence);
return ret;
}
+
+ dma_fence_put(fence);
Please delete the above if () and simplify the function tail to
dma_fence_put(fence);
return ret;
With that Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
And thanks a lot for catching this, I guess I get a prize for most useless
review ever :-/ Hopefully this one here is better.
Well so far we one inversion of min/max, one missing put and the
incorrect handling of the return code in i915.
Considering how complex the patches have been I think we are still
pretty good.
Christian.
-Daniel
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
