The commit 73511edf8b19 ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to
dma_resv obj v7") ported all the DRM drivers to use the newer fence API
that specifies the usage with the enum dma_resv_usage rather than doing
an explicit shared / exclusive distinction.

But the commit didn't do it properly in two callers of the vc4 driver,
leading to build errors.

Fixes: 73511edf8b19 ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to dma_resv 
obj v7")
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javi...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---

 drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
index 38550317e025..9eaf304fc20d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c
@@ -546,7 +546,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t 
seqno)
                bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->bo[i]->base);
                bo->seqno = seqno;
 
-               dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence);
+               dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence,
+                                  DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ);
        }
 
        list_for_each_entry(bo, &exec->unref_list, unref_head) {
@@ -557,7 +558,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t 
seqno)
                bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->rcl_write_bo[i]->base);
                bo->write_seqno = seqno;
 
-               dma_resv_add_excl_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence);
+               dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence,
+                                  DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE);
        }
 }
 
-- 
2.35.1

Reply via email to