Hi Paul,
> Am 14.02.2022 um 11:24 schrieb Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le sam., févr. 12 2022 at 16:50:50 +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller
> <h...@goldelico.com> a écrit :
>> +static void ingenic_dw_hdmi_cleanup(void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi *hdmi = (struct dw_hdmi *)data;
>> +
>> + dw_hdmi_remove(hdmi);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ingenic_dw_hdmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi *hdmi;
>> +
>> + hdmi = dw_hdmi_probe(pdev, &ingenic_dw_hdmi_plat_data);
>> + if (IS_ERR(hdmi))
>> + return PTR_ERR(hdmi);
>> +
>> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, ingenic_dw_hdmi_cleanup,
>> hdmi);
>
> I think I said it already, but in this driver you could use a .remove
> callback, there's not much point in using devm cleanups in such a simple
> setup.
Well it was your suggestion after v8:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/dia33r.qe29k7rkli...@crapouillou.net/
So we now almost go back to RFC v1 almost 2 years ago:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mips/patch/2c131e1fb19e19f958a612f7186bc83f4afb0b0a.1582744379.git....@goldelico.com/
Of course there was a good reason to better handle the regulator
AND the dw_hdmi_remove() by a single mechanism.
Now the regulator has gone and been replaced by the hdmi connector
and we can go back.
>
> In your probe you could just:
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hdmi);
No, this does not work since we need to platform_set_drvdata().
to be able to access the private struct in the remove callback.
And checking errors after platform_set_drvdata() can be done but
looks strange to me.
It is up to you what you prefer.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver ingenic_dw_hdmi_driver = {
>> + .probe = ingenic_dw_hdmi_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "dw-hdmi-ingenic",
>> + .of_match_table = ingenic_dw_hdmi_dt_ids,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(ingenic_dw_hdmi_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("JZ4780 Specific DW-HDMI Driver Extension");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:dwhdmi-ingenic");
>
> Should probably be "platform:dw-hdmi-ingenic"?
Yes, indeed. Thanks for spotting!
Was also good in v1. Probably someone deleted the hyphen unnoticed during
editing of "jz4780" to "ingenic"...
BR and thanks,
Nikolaus
