On 2/11/22 20:19, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: [snip]
>> I would put GENMASK() directly into FIELD(), but it's up to you >> (and I haven't checked the use of *_MASK anyway). >> > > Same. I also considered just using GENMASK() directly, but since I was > already reworking these, I thought that having the _MASK constant macros > would make the code more explicit about these being masks and what for. > Just to make clear, I prefer to keep the GENMASK(n, n) and *_MASK here. [snip] >> >>> + bl = devm_backlight_device_register(dev, dev_name(dev), dev, ssd130x, >>> + &ssd130xfb_bl_ops, NULL); >>> + if (IS_ERR(bl)) >>> + return ERR_PTR(dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bl), >>> + "Unable to register backlight >>> device\n")); >> >> Can be consistent with this then. >> > > Yes. I meant to change it everywhere but seems that one slipped it through. > > It's not worth to send a v6 just for the changes you mentioned but I can do > them before pushing the patches to drm-misc (once I get ack for this patch). > Another option is to post a v6 only for patch 3/6 instead of all the patch-set. Let me know what you prefer. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat
