I am not entirely sure if this fixes anything, but the code standed out
while investigated problematic calls to vunmap.

nvkm_umem.io is only ever set for the NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_IO case in
nvkm_umem_map, but never for the NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_VA one, which could lead
to taking the wrong patch inside nvkm_umem_unmap.

I just don't know if this is a real issue or not, but the code doesn't
look correct this way.

Fixes: c83c4097eba8 ("drm/nouveau/mmu: define user interfaces to mmu memory 
allocation")
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v4.15+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c
index e530bb8b3b17..2608e0796066 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/umem.c
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ nvkm_umem_map(struct nvkm_object *object, void *argv, u32 
argc,
                *handle = (unsigned long)(void *)umem->map;
                *length = nvkm_memory_size(umem->memory);
                *type = NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_VA;
+               umem->io = false;
                return 0;
        } else
        if ((umem->type & NVKM_MEM_VRAM) ||
@@ -112,12 +113,11 @@ nvkm_umem_map(struct nvkm_object *object, void *argv, u32 
argc,
                        return ret;
 
                *type = NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_IO;
-       } else {
-               return -EINVAL;
+               umem->io = true;
+               return 0;
        }
 
-       umem->io = (*type == NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_IO);
-       return 0;
+       return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static void *
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to