It makes more sense to print new SPTE value than the
old value.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevi...@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 296f8723f9ae9..43c7abdd6b70f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2708,8 +2708,8 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
kvm_memory_slot *slot,
        if (*sptep == spte) {
                ret = RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
        } else {
-               trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
                flush |= mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+               trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
        }
 
        if (wrprot) {
-- 
2.26.3

Reply via email to