On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 03:35:45PM +0800, Weizhao Ouyang wrote:
> Fix cma_heap_buffer mutex locking critical section to protect vmap_cnt
> and vaddr.
>
> Fixes: a5d2d29e24be ("dma-buf: heaps: Move heap-helper logic into the
> cma_heap implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Weizhao Ouyang <o451686...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> index 0c05b79870f9..83f02bd51dda 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> @@ -124,10 +124,11 @@ static int cma_heap_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct
> dma_buf *dmabuf,
> struct cma_heap_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
> struct dma_heap_attachment *a;
>
> + mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
> +
> if (buffer->vmap_cnt)
> invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(buffer->vaddr, buffer->len);
Since this creates nesting with mm/, but optionally I think it'd be good
to prime lockdep so it knows about this. See e.g. dma_resv_lockdep() in
dma-resv.c, except I don't know offhand what the right lock for
invalidate_kernel_vmap_range is.
-Daniel
>
> - mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
> list_for_each_entry(a, &buffer->attachments, list) {
> if (!a->mapped)
> continue;
> @@ -144,10 +145,11 @@ static int cma_heap_dma_buf_end_cpu_access(struct
> dma_buf *dmabuf,
> struct cma_heap_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
> struct dma_heap_attachment *a;
>
> + mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
> +
> if (buffer->vmap_cnt)
> flush_kernel_vmap_range(buffer->vaddr, buffer->len);
>
> - mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
> list_for_each_entry(a, &buffer->attachments, list) {
> if (!a->mapped)
> continue;
> --
> 2.32.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
