> 24.11.2021 10:18, Akhil R пишет: > >> *i2c_dev) > >>> i2c_dev->is_vi = true; } > >> How are you going to differentiate the VI I2C from a non-VI? This > >> doesn't look right. > > This patch adds the ACPI support to only non-VI I2C. The device_ids in > > match table are added accordingly. I suppose, of_device_is_compatible > > always returns false as there is no device tree. > > Agree with the other comments. > > Will the VI I2C have a different ACPI ID or how it's going to work? As there is a different compatible for VI I2C in device tree, I suppose the ACPI would have a different ID as well. I think the logic would also need an update if to have VI I2C using the ACPI. But that wasn't actually considered in this patch.
Best Regards, Akhil
