On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:56:38 +0200 Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Yay, that patch is just impressive. Lands a new gpu tracepoints, never > even showed up on the gpu subsystem discussion list. I'm guessing there was some confusion. When this was first introduced, I stated it needs to go into the gpu tree, which a new set of patches included more Cc's. I never checked if those Cc's were for the GPU maintainers or not (I assumed they were). https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200224113805.134f8...@gandalf.local.home/ I'm not sure where Yiwei Zhang got his email list for the GPU maintainers from. As he obviously thought it was going to them. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKT=dDnFpj2hJd5z73pfcrhXXacDpPVyKzC7+K94tsX=+e_...@mail.gmail.com/ Seeing that this patch set is going through dri-devel list, which I'm guessing is also for GPU, even though it's not under that in the MAINTAINERS file: DRM DRIVERS AND MISC GPU PATCHES M: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> M: Maxime Ripard <mrip...@kernel.org> M: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de> S: Maintained W: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/maintainer-tools/drm-misc.html T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc F: Documentation/gpu/ F: drivers/gpu/drm/* F: drivers/gpu/vga/ F: include/drm/drm* F: include/linux/vga* F: include/uapi/drm/drm* Should the list be added there? I've been struggling with this patch set because nobody claimed ownership for it. But now I believe we have one (you? :-) And I can now just comment on the tracing POV and leave the content and usability to you folks ;-) -- Steve
