Am 15.10.21 um 13:57 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
Commit 7fa828cb9265 ("dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_test_signaled")
accidentally forgot to test whether the dma-buf is actually signaled, breaking
pretty much everything depending on it.

NAK, the dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked() returns only unsignaled fences. So the code is correct as it is.

Regards,
Christian.


Fixes: 7fa828cb9265 ("dma-buf: use new iterator in dma_resv_test_signaled")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
---
  drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 8 +++++---
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
index 70a8082660c5..37ab2875e469 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
@@ -655,14 +655,16 @@ bool dma_resv_test_signaled(struct dma_resv *obj, bool 
test_all)
  {
        struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
        struct dma_fence *fence;
+       bool ret = true;
dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, obj, test_all);
        dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
-               dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
-               return false;
+               ret = dma_fence_is_signaled(fence);
+               if (!ret)
+                       break;
        }
        dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
-       return true;
+       return ret;
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_resv_test_signaled);

Reply via email to