Hi,
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 04.10.2021 um 09:27 +0200 schrieb Guido Günther:
> > If a bridge doesn't do any bus format handling MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED is
> > returned. Fallback to a reasonable default (MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24) in
> > that case.
> >
> > This unbreaks e.g. using mxsfb with the nwl bridge and mipi panels.
> >
> > Fixes: b776b0f00f24 ("drm: mxsfb: Use bus_format from the nearest bridge if
> > present")
> >
> I don't think this qualifies for stable, so I would drop this tag, as
> the stable maintainers are quite trigger happy to pull in patches with
> a fixes tag. Also the subject isn't quite correct, this isn't setting a
> "proper" bus format, but rather adds a fallback. Other than that:
Adjusted for v3 (which I'll hold off a bit in case there are more
comments) and dropped the Fixes: tag which is on the nwl driver
only now. thanks!
-- Guido
>
> Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.st...@pengutronix.de>
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
>
> > Reported-by: Martin Kepplinger <mart...@posteo.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <a...@sigxcpu.org>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c
> > index d6abd2077114..e3fbb8b58d5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mxsfb/mxsfb_kms.c
> > @@ -369,6 +369,12 @@ static void mxsfb_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc
> > *crtc,
> > drm_atomic_get_new_bridge_state(state,
> > mxsfb->bridge);
> > bus_format = bridge_state->input_bus_cfg.format;
> > + if (bus_format == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED) {
> > + dev_warn_once(drm->dev,
> > + "Bridge does not provide bus format,
> > assuming MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24.\n"
> > + "Please fix bridge driver by handling
> > atomic_get_input_bus_fmts.\n");
> > + bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* If there is no bridge, use bus format from connector */
>
>
