On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:22:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It will be only consistent once we've restored all the crtcs. Since a > bunch of other callers also want to just restore a single crtc, add a > boolean to disable checking only where it doesn't make sense. > > Note that intel_modeset_setup_hw_state already has a call to > intel_modeset_check_state at the end, so we don't reduce the amount of > checking. > > v2: Try harder not to create a big patch (Chris). > > v3: Even smaller (still Chris). Also fix a trailing space. > > References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/16/60 > Cc: Tomas Melin <tomas.me...@iki.fi> > Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
I'm happy that you are not touching any paths other than mentioned in the changelog, and that I think being quiet on the modeset is a good use of the 'force' semantics, so Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
