On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 06:51:22AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> If the context is reset as a result of the request cancelation the
> context reset G2H is received after schedule disable done G2H which is
> likely the wrong order. The schedule disable done G2H release the
> waiting request cancelation code which resubmits the context. This races
> with the context reset G2H which also wants to resubmit the context but
> in this case it really should be a NOP as request cancelation code owns
> the resubmit. Use some clever tricks of checking the context state to
> seal this race until if / when the GuC firmware is fixed.
>
> v2:
> (Checkpatch)
> - Fix typos
>
> Fixes: 62eaf0ae217d ("drm/i915/guc: Support request cancellation")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 3cd2da6f5c03..c3b7bf7319dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -826,17 +826,35 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_context *ce)
> static void __guc_reset_context(struct intel_context *ce, bool stalled)
> {
> struct i915_request *rq;
> + unsigned long flags;
> u32 head;
> + bool skip = false;
>
> intel_context_get(ce);
>
> /*
> - * GuC will implicitly mark the context as non-schedulable
> - * when it sends the reset notification. Make sure our state
> - * reflects this change. The context will be marked enabled
> - * on resubmission.
> + * GuC will implicitly mark the context as non-schedulable when it sends
> + * the reset notification. Make sure our state reflects this change. The
> + * context will be marked enabled on resubmission.
> + *
> + * XXX: If the context is reset as a result of the request cancellation
> + * this G2H is received after the schedule disable complete G2H which is
> + * likely wrong as this creates a race between the request cancellation
> + * code re-submitting the context and this G2H handler. This likely
> + * should be fixed in the GuC but until if / when that gets fixed we
> + * need to workaround this. Convert this function to a NOP if a pending
> + * enable is in flight as this indicates that a request cancellation has
> + * occurred.
> */
> - clr_context_enabled(ce);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> + if (likely(!context_pending_enable(ce))) {
> + clr_context_enabled(ce);
> + } else {
> + skip = true;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> + if (unlikely(skip))
> + goto out_put;
>
> rq = intel_context_find_active_request(ce);
> if (!rq) {
> @@ -855,6 +873,7 @@ static void __guc_reset_context(struct intel_context *ce,
> bool stalled)
> out_replay:
> guc_reset_state(ce, head, stalled);
> __unwind_incomplete_requests(ce);
> +out_put:
> intel_context_put(ce);
> }
>
> @@ -1599,6 +1618,13 @@ static void guc_context_cancel_request(struct
> intel_context *ce,
> guc_reset_state(ce, intel_ring_wrap(ce->ring, rq->head),
> true);
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * XXX: Racey if context is reset, see comment in
> + * __guc_reset_context().
> + */
> + flush_work(&ce_to_guc(ce)->ct.requests.worker);
This looks racy, and I think that holds in general for all the flush_work
you're adding: This only flushes the processing of the work, it doesn't
stop any re-queueing (as far as I can tell at least), which means it
doesn't do a hole lot.
Worse, your task is re-queue because it only processes one item at a time.
That means flush_work only flushes the first invocation, but not even
drains them all. So even if you do prevent requeueing somehow, this isn't
what you want. Two solutions.
- flush_work_sync, which flushes until self-requeues are all done too
- Or more preferred, make you're worker a bit more standard for this
stuff: a) under the spinlock, take the entire list, not just the first
entry, with list_move or similar to a local list b) process that local
list in a loop b) don't requeue youreself.
Cheers, Daniel
> +
> guc_context_unblock(ce);
> }
> }
> @@ -2719,7 +2745,12 @@ static void guc_handle_context_reset(struct intel_guc
> *guc,
> {
> trace_intel_context_reset(ce);
>
> - if (likely(!intel_context_is_banned(ce))) {
> + /*
> + * XXX: Racey if request cancellation has occurred, see comment in
> + * __guc_reset_context().
> + */
> + if (likely(!intel_context_is_banned(ce) &&
> + !context_blocked(ce))) {
> capture_error_state(guc, ce);
> guc_context_replay(ce);
> }
> --
> 2.32.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
