From: Guangming Cao <guangming....@mediatek.com>

On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 14:24 +0800, guangming....@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Guangming Cao <guangming....@mediatek.com>
> 
> On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 18:14 +0800, guangming....@mediatek.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Sumit, Christian, Matthias,
> 
> gentle ping for this patch :)

move receviers to '--to' list.
gentle ping for this patch  :)

> 
> BRs!
> Guangming
> 
> > From: Guangming Cao <guangming....@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > For dma-heap users, they can't bypass cache sync when map/unmap
> > iova
> > with dma heap. But they can do it by adding DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC
> > into dma_alloc_attrs.
> > 
> > To keep alignment, at dma_heap side, also use
> > dma_buf_attachment.dma_map_attrs to do iova map & unmap.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guangming Cao <guangming....@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c    | 6 ++++--
> >  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 6 ++++--
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c b/drivers/dma-
> > buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> > index 0c05b79870f9..2c9feb3bfc3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c
> > @@ -99,9 +99,10 @@ static struct sg_table
> > *cma_heap_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachme
> >  {
> >     struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> >     struct sg_table *table = &a->table;
> > +   int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> >     int ret;
> >  
> > -   ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > +   ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction,
> > attrs);
> >     if (ret)
> >             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >     a->mapped = true;
> > @@ -113,9 +114,10 @@ static void cma_heap_unmap_dma_buf(struct
> > dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> >                                enum dma_data_direction direction)
> >  {
> >     struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> > +   int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> >  
> >     a->mapped = false;
> > -   dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > +   dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, attrs);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int cma_heap_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf
> > *dmabuf,
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-
> > buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> > index 23a7e74ef966..fc7b1e02988e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> > @@ -130,9 +130,10 @@ static struct sg_table
> > *system_heap_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attac
> >  {
> >     struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> >     struct sg_table *table = a->table;
> > +   int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> >     int ret;
> >  
> > -   ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > +   ret = dma_map_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction,
> > attrs);
> >     if (ret)
> >             return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >  
> > @@ -145,9 +146,10 @@ static void system_heap_unmap_dma_buf(struct
> > dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> >                                   enum dma_data_direction
> > direction)
> >  {
> >     struct dma_heap_attachment *a = attachment->priv;
> > +   int attrs = attachment->dma_map_attrs;
> >  
> >     a->mapped = false;
> > -   dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, 0);
> > +   dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, table, direction, attrs);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int system_heap_dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf
> > *dmabuf,
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 

Reply via email to