On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 10:11 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > We kinda left this out, and I like the wording from the drm-intel > side, so add that. Motivated by a discussion with Christian. > > Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <mrip...@kernel.org> > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
Pushed, thanks for all the r-b/acks. -Daniel > --- > committer-drm-misc.rst | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/committer-drm-misc.rst b/committer-drm-misc.rst > index 9497a5d26a9d..110ca8b0525e 100644 > --- a/committer-drm-misc.rst > +++ b/committer-drm-misc.rst > @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ Merge Criteria > > Right now the only hard merge criteria are: > > +* There must not be open issues or unresolved or conflicting feedback from > + anyone. Clear them up first. Defer to maintainers as needed. > + > * Patch is properly reviewed or at least Ack, i.e. don't just push your own > stuff directly. This rule holds even more for bugfix patches - it would be > embarrassing if the bugfix contains a small gotcha that review would have > -- > 2.32.0 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
