Hi,

> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Juli 2021 um 17:03 Uhr
> Von: "Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang...@kernel.org>

> I think you have done many experiment [1] and you bisect between
> 2e4773915223 (good) and be18cd1fcae2 (bad), and you are confused by
> merge commit.
> You may refer to [2] and it may help you to understand git bisect.

thanks for confirming the strange behaviour is caused by merge-commit. that was 
i'm thinking about...if the merge-commit is not in actual bisect "tree" then 
all commits linked to it disappear. basicly i understand bisect (binary search 
- checkout a commit by splitting commits in 2 halfes and then splitting the bad 
half again and again till only 1 commit is detected).

Imho the simplest solution may be flatten the tree (at least from good..HEAD) 
by rebasing, right?

tried simple rebasing (from 5.12-rc2 sha1 ~17823 commits), but failed somewhere 
in usb-subsystem ;(

i guess this happens if changes made in mergecommit...also tried with 
--rebase-merges and --preserve-merges but all do not make the history complete 
flat without conflicts

set the merge itself as good is not a solution, as there are many merges and in 
one is the breaking commit

other examples in your link do not change current history, only give tips for 
merging without these merge-commits

i have git v2.25.1

btw. i have done many more experiments as public visible, reverting commits 
that may break (many i can't revert as they have depencies-code changed in same 
block after the commit to be reverted - e.g.) by reading commit-message, and 
adding some debug-messages in the drm_atomic_helper.c 
(drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks,drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done where 
the WARN() is done), but i have not yet nailed down the issue

> [1] http://forum.banana-pi.org/t/bpi-r2-hdmi-4k-tv-fail/12307/4
> [2] 
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17267816/git-bisect-with-merged-commits

Reply via email to