On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:39:45PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Now that we're not racing with GPU setup, also fix races of timestamps
> against other timestamps.  In CI, we were seeing this path trigger
> timeouts on setting the GMU bit, especially on the first set of tests
> right after boot (it's probably easier to lose the race than one might
> think, given that we start many tests in parallel, and waiting for NFS
> to page in code probably means that lots of tests hit the same point
> of screen init at the same time).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v5.9

The joys of not having a global mutex locking everything.

Reviewed-by: Jordan Crouse <jcro...@codeaurora.org>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 7424a70b9d35..e8f0b5325a7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,9 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, 
> uint64_t *value)
>  {
>       struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>       struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> +     static DEFINE_MUTEX(perfcounter_oob);
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&perfcounter_oob);
>  
>       /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
>       a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
> @@ -1183,6 +1186,7 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, 
> uint64_t *value)
>               REG_A6XX_RBBM_PERFCTR_CP_0_HI);
>  
>       a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
> +     mutex_unlock(&perfcounter_oob);
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to