Den 21.01.2021 11.20, skrev Simon Ser:
> On Thursday, January 21st, 2021 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Zimmermann
> <tzimmerm...@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> Well, I'd strongly ask to not call it "generic", because it isn't. We
>> have other USB drivers and anyone can make a USB display with these
>> protocols as well. That doesn't make them generic. A USB-standardized
>> protocol would be generic. Maybe call it custom, or home-made.
I agree that Generic probably isn't the best term to use here. Naming
stuff is hard. Maybe: Open USB Display Protocol - oudp?
>
> Maybe rename it to "GUD USB Display driver"? :P
>
Oh that's a recursive acronym :-) That would save me all the work of
renaming. I think I'll go with that, thanks.
Noralf.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
