On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:40:22PM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > The SN65DSI86 provides the ability to supply a PWM signal on GPIO 4, > with the primary purpose of controlling the backlight of the attached > panel. Add an implementation that exposes this using the standard PWM > framework, to allow e.g. pwm-backlight to expose this to the user. > > Special thanks to Doug Anderson for suggestions related to the involved > math. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 202 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > index f27306c51e4d..43c0acba57ab 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > * datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn65dsi86.pdf > */ > > +#include <linux/atomic.h> > #include <linux/bits.h> > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/debugfs.h> > @@ -14,6 +15,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of_graph.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include <linux/pwm.h> > #include <linux/regmap.h> > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > > @@ -89,6 +91,11 @@ > #define SN_ML_TX_MODE_REG 0x96 > #define ML_TX_MAIN_LINK_OFF 0 > #define ML_TX_NORMAL_MODE BIT(0) > +#define SN_PWM_PRE_DIV_REG 0xA0 > +#define SN_BACKLIGHT_SCALE_REG 0xA1 > +#define BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX 0xFFFF > +#define SN_BACKLIGHT_REG 0xA3 > +#define SN_PWM_EN_INV_REG 0xA5 > #define SN_AUX_CMD_STATUS_REG 0xF4 > #define AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_RPLY_TOUT BIT(3) > #define AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_SHORT BIT(5) > @@ -111,6 +118,8 @@ > > #define SN_LINK_TRAINING_TRIES 10 > > +#define SN_PWM_GPIO 3
So this maps to the GPIO4 described in sn65dsi86 datasheet. I'm wondering if it's more readable to define the following SHIFT constants (your code), and use GPIO_MUX_GPIO4_SHIFT >> 2 where you need GPIO offset? #define GPIO_MUX_GPIO1_SHIFT 0 #define GPIO_MUX_GPIO2_SHIFT 2 #define GPIO_MUX_GPIO3_SHIFT 4 #define GPIO_MUX_GPIO4_SHIFT 6 If you agree, you may consider to integrate this patch beforehand: https://github.com/shawnguo2/linux/commit/7cde887ffb3b27a36e77a08bee3666d14968b586 Shawn > + > /** > * struct ti_sn_bridge - Platform data for ti-sn65dsi86 driver. > * @dev: Pointer to our device. > @@ -162,6 +171,12 @@ struct ti_sn_bridge { > struct gpio_chip gchip; > DECLARE_BITMAP(gchip_output, SN_NUM_GPIOS); > #endif > +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM) > + struct pwm_chip pchip; > + bool pwm_enabled; > + unsigned int pwm_refclk; > + atomic_t pwm_pin_busy; > +#endif > }; > > static const struct regmap_range ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges[] = { > @@ -499,6 +514,14 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_refclk_freq(struct > ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > > regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DPPLL_SRC_REG, REFCLK_FREQ_MASK, > REFCLK_FREQ(i)); > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM) > + /* > + * The PWM refclk is based on the value written to SN_DPPLL_SRC_REG, > + * regardless of its actual sourcing. > + */ > + pdata->pwm_refclk = ti_sn_bridge_refclk_lut[i]; > +#endif > } > > static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > @@ -981,6 +1004,161 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(struct > ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > return 0; > } > > +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM) > +static int ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > +{ > + return atomic_xchg(&pdata->pwm_pin_busy, 1) ? -EBUSY : 0; > +} > + > +static void ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > +{ > + atomic_set(&pdata->pwm_pin_busy, 0); > +} > + > +static struct ti_sn_bridge * > +pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct pwm_chip *chip) > +{ > + return container_of(chip, struct ti_sn_bridge, pchip); > +} > + > +static int ti_sn_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > +{ > + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip); > + > + return ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(pdata); > +} > + > +static void ti_sn_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > +{ > + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip); > + > + ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(pdata); > +} > + > +static int ti_sn_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, > + const struct pwm_state *state) > +{ > + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip); > + unsigned int pwm_en_inv; > + unsigned int backlight; > + unsigned int pwm_freq; > + unsigned int pre_div; > + unsigned int scale; > + int ret; > + > + if (!pdata->pwm_enabled) { > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + ret = regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_GPIO_CTRL_REG, > + SN_GPIO_MUX_MASK << (2 * SN_PWM_GPIO), > + SN_GPIO_MUX_SPECIAL << (2 * > SN_PWM_GPIO)); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to mux in PWM function\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + } > + > + if (state->enabled) { > + /* > + * Per the datasheet the PWM frequency is given by: > + * > + * PWM_FREQ = REFCLK_FREQ / (PWM_PRE_DIV * BACKLIGHT_SCALE + 1) > + * > + * In order to find the PWM_FREQ that best suits the requested > + * state->period, the PWM_PRE_DIV is calculated with the > + * maximum possible number of steps (BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX). The > + * actual BACKLIGHT_SCALE is then adjusted down to match the > + * requested period. > + * > + * The BACKLIGHT value is then calculated against the > + * BACKLIGHT_SCALE, based on the requested duty_cycle and > + * period. > + */ > + pwm_freq = NSEC_PER_SEC / state->period; > + pre_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(pdata->pwm_refclk / pwm_freq - 1, > BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX); > + scale = (pdata->pwm_refclk / pwm_freq - 1) / pre_div; > + > + backlight = scale * state->duty_cycle / state->period; > + > + ret = regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PWM_PRE_DIV_REG, pre_div); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to update PWM_PRE_DIV\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_BACKLIGHT_SCALE_REG, scale); > + ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_BACKLIGHT_REG, backlight); > + } > + > + pwm_en_inv = FIELD_PREP(BIT(1), !!state->enabled) | > + FIELD_PREP(BIT(0), state->polarity == > PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED); > + ret = regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PWM_EN_INV_REG, pwm_en_inv); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to update PWM_EN/PWM_INV\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + pdata->pwm_enabled = !!state->enabled; > +out: > + > + if (!pdata->pwm_enabled) > + pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static const struct pwm_ops ti_sn_pwm_ops = { > + .request = ti_sn_pwm_request, > + .free = ti_sn_pwm_free, > + .apply = ti_sn_pwm_apply, > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > +}; > + > +static struct pwm_device *ti_sn_pwm_of_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc, > + const struct of_phandle_args *args) > +{ > + struct pwm_device *pwm; > + > + if (args->args_count != 1) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + > + pwm = pwm_request_from_chip(pc, 0, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(pwm)) > + return pwm; > + > + pwm->args.period = args->args[0]; > + > + return pwm; > +} > + > +static int ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > +{ > + pdata->pchip.dev = pdata->dev; > + pdata->pchip.ops = &ti_sn_pwm_ops; > + pdata->pchip.base = -1; > + pdata->pchip.npwm = 1; > + pdata->pchip.of_xlate = ti_sn_pwm_of_xlate; > + pdata->pchip.of_pwm_n_cells = 1; > + > + return pwmchip_add(&pdata->pchip); > +} > + > +static void ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > +{ > + pwmchip_remove(&pdata->pchip); > + > + if (pdata->pwm_enabled) > + pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev); > +} > +#else > +static int ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) { return 0; } > +static void ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) {} > +static int ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) { return 0; } > +static void ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) {} > +#endif > + > #if defined(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) > > static int tn_sn_bridge_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip, > @@ -1113,10 +1291,25 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_output(struct > gpio_chip *chip, > return ret; > } > > +static int ti_sn_bridge_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int > offset) > +{ > + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + > + if (offset == SN_PWM_GPIO) > + return ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(pdata); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static void ti_sn_bridge_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int > offset) > { > + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + > /* We won't keep pm_runtime if we're input, so switch there on free */ > ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_input(chip, offset); > + > + if (offset == SN_PWM_GPIO) > + ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(pdata); > } > > static const char * const ti_sn_bridge_gpio_names[SN_NUM_GPIOS] = { > @@ -1136,6 +1329,7 @@ static int ti_sn_setup_gpio_controller(struct > ti_sn_bridge *pdata) > pdata->gchip.owner = THIS_MODULE; > pdata->gchip.of_xlate = tn_sn_bridge_of_xlate; > pdata->gchip.of_gpio_n_cells = 2; > + pdata->gchip.request = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_request; > pdata->gchip.free = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_free; > pdata->gchip.get_direction = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_get_direction; > pdata->gchip.direction_input = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_input; > @@ -1282,6 +1476,12 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client > *client, > return ret; > } > > + ret = ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(pdata); > + if (ret) { > + pm_runtime_disable(pdata->dev); > + return ret; > + } > + > i2c_set_clientdata(client, pdata); > > pdata->aux.name = "ti-sn65dsi86-aux"; > @@ -1320,6 +1520,8 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client > *client) > > drm_bridge_remove(&pdata->bridge); > > + ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(pdata); > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.29.2 > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
