On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:38 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/11/2020 16:16, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:15 PM Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Neil.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 09:31:36AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 29/10/2020 23:20, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>>> Hi Anitha.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:27:52PM -0700, Anitha Chrisanthus wrote:
> >>>>> This patch adds bindings for Intel KeemBay Display
> >>>>>
> >>>>> v2: review changes from Rob Herring
> >>>>> v3: review changes from Sam Ravnborg (removed mipi dsi entries, and
> >>>>>     encoder entry, connect port to dsi)
> >>>>>     MSSCAM is part of the display submodule and its used to reset LCD
> >>>>>     and MIPI DSI clocks, so its best to be on this device tree.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Anitha Chrisanthus <anitha.chrisant...@intel.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
> >>>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de>
> >>>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks good - and the split betwwen the display and the mipi<->dsi parts
> >>>> matches the understanding of the HW I have developed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  .../bindings/display/intel,keembay-display.yaml    | 75 
> >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >>>>>  create mode 100644 
> >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,keembay-display.yaml
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git 
> >>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,keembay-display.yaml 
> >>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,keembay-display.yaml
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 0000000..8a8effe
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ 
> >>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,keembay-display.yaml
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
> >>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>>>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>>>> +---
> >>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/intel,keembay-display.yaml#
> >>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +title: Devicetree bindings for Intel Keem Bay display controller
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +maintainers:
> >>>>> +  - Anitha Chrisanthus <anitha.chrisant...@intel.com>
> >>>>> +  - Edmond J Dea <edmund.j....@intel.com>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +properties:
> >>>>> +  compatible:
> >>>>> +    const: intel,keembay-display
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +  reg:
> >>>>> +    items:
> >>>>> +      - description: LCD registers range
> >>>>> +      - description: Msscam registers range
> >>>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Indeed the split is much better, but as you replied on 
> >>> http://lore.kernel.org/r/by5pr11mb41827de07436dd0454e24e6e8c...@by5pr11mb4182.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
> >>> the msscam seems to be shared with the camera subsystem block, if this is 
> >>> the case it should be handled.
> >>>
> >>> If it's a shared register block, it could be defined as a "syscon" used 
> >>> by both subsystems.
> >>
> >> I think I got it now.
> >>
> >> msscam is used to enable clocks both for the display driver and the
> >> mipi-dsi part.
> >
> > If just clocks, then the msscam should be a clock provider possibly.
> > If not, then the below looks right.
>
> I agree
>
> >
> >>
> >> So it should be pulled in to a dedicated node - for example like this:
> >>
> >> mssscam: msscam@20910000 {
> >>         compatible = "intel,keembay-msscam", "syscon";
> >>         reg = <0x20910000, 0x30>;
> >>         reg-io-width = <4>;
> >> };
> >>
> >> And ofc we need a binding file for that.
> >>
> >>
> >> And then we could have code like this in the display driver:
> >>         regmap *msscam = 
> >> syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("intel,keembay-msscam");
> >>         if (IS_ERR(msscam))
> >>                 tell-and goto-out;
>
> It's better to use a phandle in the display node, instead of looking for 
> compatible nodes.

No, you don't need it in DT unless there's more than one instance or
other parameters needed like register offsets/masks. The above is
actually faster too walking a list rather than a phandle look up
(though the phandle cache now may make it faster).

Rob
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to